फ़रवरी 22, 2012 को ही अपने ब्लॉग मिसफिट पर एक आलेख लिखा था कि हम वर्ज़नाओं के खिलाफ सोचऔर शरीर के साथ एक जुट हो गए थे लेख देखिये जिसे देख आप आप यकीन अवश्य ही करेंगे लगभग 6 साल पूर्व लिखा
गया आलेख आज की सच्चाई बयान कर गया था जिसका अंदाजा मुझे भी न था कि आज जब सुप्रीम कोर्ट का
फैसला आते ही आर्काइव में पड़ा ये आलेख अचानक सम-सामयिक हो जावेगा उक्त आलेख का अंग्रेज़ी तर्जुमा करने में मेरी मदद की श्री हेमंत बवानकर जी, पुणे एवं श्री विकास खंडेलवाल जी ने उनका हार्दिक आभार
Some changes in the lifestyle are being heard due to which a radical change in social order is inevitable. I thought that it would not be easy to change the traditional form of social setup. But due to the rapidly changing social thinking in the last ten years, it seems that the changes are very close, probably in the next five years ... maybe even before that. The main thought behind this is “how to live the life?” is not a question at this juncture. Now the question is" how to manage the life?". The question of how to solve the problem was looked after by taking into consideration the social barriers. But, now-a-days, the care of the taboos for the management of the life is kept in a category not necessary from a logical perspective. The first effect of the change in the lifestyle or the way of living is seen in the social status and management of the family especially on sexual relations. No doubt, the marriage is a matter of individual rights of male and female, but now it is not a big issue to say that it has been the right to manage the emerging physical (unauthorized) aspirations due to the busy life of a man or a woman. In reality, such a situation is being named as helplessness. For the moment, love-story is not going to change in the detached hate story, but now, as far as the future of tomorrow is concerned, it will be a time that is "physical (unauthorized?) management of aspirations" as an authority. The other party will adopt a positive attitude towards the demand for such rights. Its root cause is “distances and busy engagement which will cause due to economic reasons".
Today's period has become more amazed when the Supreme Court passes an order in favoring Adultery beyond the category of crime.
This is not futuristic nor I am a predictor ... but the situation reflected by the rapidly coming change gives us a vision of the situation in the future. None can stop someone forcefully. Now the doors have been opened for the social system to be influenced by thewestern society.
Today, when the Supreme Court's verdict has come, the article in the archive has suddenly become contemporary.
Thoughts and standing against the traditional taboos created by the social system can affect the lives of the villages and cities after the metros, in the Indian environment.
We will be surprised to see this development. Sex is a biological need, in the same way, our" family living in the group" is a social need. The pressure of the economic work will at first affect these things. Then the couples will adopt a compromise policy to retain the family structure fulfilling biological needs. Our society may become failure to protect the culture forcibly. It is not as if its examples are not present. People just try to avoid.
* Osho had a strange argument in this regard - that one should first ensure mental and physical bond or coordination before the marriage. I have a total disagreement over this issue. The society is not a commune of Osho. Neither the society nor I am ruled by them*
* Just like Osho, the western system seems to dominate the society so much that it is not possible for anyone to escape from this impending black hole. Maybe my whole article will prove to be false, yes, but of course, it is possible only if stability in the life is entered. People will be able to deny Freud only if they live a traveler’s life of truck drivers (male and female) while their self-power is matured with spiritual contemplation, but this is not the case. While teaching the ethics of curbing the consumption of multiple sex opportunities under the spiritual and social system.The lessons of abstinence are taught in order to maintain another social morality, on the other hand, the crisis of sexually transmitted diseases are also avoided from life, whereas science is used only for the condom use to stop STD (Sexually-Transmitted-Disease). *
The social system reveals the situations of sinfulness and gives a glimpse of fear and orders restraint. On the other hand, living life on the basis of excessive superstitious arguments may deny this order as a symbol of backwardness. Let us see what happens, maybe all the thinkers will be agree with my experience, at least, partly.
